Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Peep Totter Fly


I saw this video a few weeks ago, and it seemed cool too.


This is Peep Totter Fly by Cheri Gaulke at LACE (from last year though).


I loved the concept: A wall set up like that of a shoe showroom with only one pair of shoes on every stand. It got better as the line of models mechanically started wearing them and even better, started sauntering along Hollywood Blvd in them.

By this time, I had many ideas, about stuff like gender norms being challenged with the inclusion of males in a largely female performance that includes red high heels, and when I saw the guy barely managing to walk straight I thought about men in women’s shoes – literally and metaphorically – would they feel pain? Would they feel pretty? I thought some would feel pain and some might feel pretty and some might feel the same. It also struck me that it could be a high heel survival marathon.

I wasn’t so keen about the part when the audience started trying on shoes. I am not sure why, but maybe it was because the interaction, I felt, was on a rather superficial level, and had been done before in the same way too many times.

I liked the colours; the white walls and white clothes seemed to accentuate the red of the heels well. I also liked the shots of the heels on the Walk of Fame. And I loved it when people asked “What’s this for?”

ON RIGHT NOW: Capsize and Now he’s out in public and everyone can see


Although I am not much familiar with the mechanisms behind performance art, when I went to the current exhibits at Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions (LACE), I could see the many ways how the artists employed performance to make art. I think they are great for anyone interested in learning more about performance art. And even if you are not interested, they still show you about the many ways you can enhance any work of art through performance.

*Spoiler Alert* *Nudity Alert*

The first exhibit, Capsize, by Tad Beck and Jennifer Locke, was technically not merely performance; it was more graphic art. The performances had been captured before-hand via film, and played again on a loop at the exhibit. One performance was actually carried out during the opening, recorded, and played on a loop at the front gallery for the rest of the week. Beck acknowledged that his art was not so much performance, as it was the way performance was captured.

the bubble pictures
For example, in the bubble pictures, the elements in the pictures were captured in a surreal manner, jumbled up like a Rubik’s Cube. The water took up most of the area, and through the blurry background you could make out the figure of a nude male. It is only through the tiny bubble in the centre that you can see a defining shape. This is certainly something that would be hard to pull off with the performance medium alone.

the guy on the stool

On the other side of the exhibit were pictures of a man in various positions on a stool. The way this man was captured on film, in the air, probably in the act of some flailing motion, but captured in an extremely still frame, made the viewer contemplate whether he was in motion or not. This balance again plays on the medium of performance art.

The other pieces were two pairs of videos projected onto opposite walls of the gallery, with the two videos from each pair synchronized with its partner and projected next to each other. The videos captured a similar topsy-turvy performance, but this time the videos were shot through opposite angles. However, they still retained a common focal point, and were placed next to each other based on this focal point. This created an extremely vivid contrast, one that struck me powerfully.

the seated bald guy looking at himself in the projection.
in the back you can see the paired projections.
The live performance capture that took place on the Thursday opening comprised a nude male sitting on a high stool (which he climbed and descended using a white, fetishy swing) that was placed in a black, rubber boat, and being doused in glue by the artists, who were clad in white coats (the whole room was white; so was the glue, which became transparent as it dried up). He then sat there for three hours, being turned around on the stool 180 degrees every half-hour. He was being captured through a video camera from the ceiling, and you could see the video in the front gallery, projected here as well from the ceiling onto the floor. It was like a replica, except that there was no literal performance taking place in the front gallery. All this time, spectators could go the back micro-lounge and see the performance take place through a glass panel. Although the next day the model/artist said he did not intend for this, he was shivering and twitching by the end of his performance. I think it actually served to bring out the themes better, especially those of sexuality and (probably) erotic sadism.

I would like to add here that the thought behind the way the gallery space was used was also a new thing for me. I had never thought that so much time went into the perfect placement of each work to achieve harmony and the greatest effect on the spectator. The walls of the front gallery were completely covered by 5 giant projections. The empty space was used for hanging still pictures. The ambience created by the sound of the water made one feel like in a different world, as if experiencing the performance first-hand. The way that the artists made use of the unique dimensions and shapes of the gallery space was like a part of the art itself. For example, Beck and Locke decided to use the central pillar in the micro-lounge for the swing, and use the area next to it for the boat. The curator for this show was Marjorie Vecchio.

This environmental effect was especially more prominent in the next exhibit that was synchronously going on in another room separated by a heavy, black curtain made by Kim. In this exhibit, called Now he’s out in public and everyone can see, Natalie Bookchin created an 18 channel video using excerpts from videos collected from around the world through the internet, of random vlogger’s comments on scandals involving African-American men. The different layers were not put into one video, however. Each layer was put on 18 separate television screens scattered throughout the dark room. So, if you entered, you would suddenly be turned around by one TV person saying “HE IS BLACK!”, then, in perfect sync, another would light up with someone saying “I am not racist, but...”. So many different patterns were explored in this way, with sometimes many screens working together to say similar things, or just one screen saying something weird or sanctimonious, or sometimes the whole room would go dark, silently begging for reflection. In general, this presentation in such an empty environment, combatted with the room’s irregular, yet harmonious, saturation with so many voices through different senses like audio and video, made one feel like in a different world. The irony here is that this is the world we are living in.

stills of the different vloggers.
While one spectator came out of the exhibit after five minutes feeling disoriented, I felt that the longer you stood there, the better you could connect the dots about societal attitudes and changes.

After viewing this exhibit, I was thinking about how much of contemporary art these days includes performance. Maybe this is similar to how rhetoric is used in all mediums to call for interactive engagement.
Apart from these two exhibits, there is also the exhibit from last week’s Staalplaat Soundsystem performance and Margie Livingston’s Twenty Gallons up at LACE.

More information here.
Photographs taken from the LACE website for education purposes.