In my opinion, good
design is typically a combination of different qualities. As we have mentioned in
class, these qualities or elements can be anything from function to aesthetic
appeal. The best square that exemplified good design can be seen in the picture
below. I feel as though this qualifies as a “good” or successful design because
the unique shapes draw in my curiosity and attention. It makes me think that I’m
only getting a small taste of something larger (perhaps a close up of an animal’s
skin), and in doing so, the sketch leaves it up to my imagination. Having said
that, I believe that this design is ambiguous as it gives power to the
spectator to determine what it is and what it means for him/her. In a sense, the spectator is challenged to
think of what these shapes make up or what they could possibly mean. Overall, I
think good design invokes either an emotional, social, or psychological
response in people, but this is largely based on what viewers bring (their
experiences and so forth) when they observe the piece; that is, successful design
is negotiable in that as design, our sensibilities, and tastes/preferences change,
so do our relationships with it (to creativity/art/style). In short, good
design, for me is something that stands out uniquely and is able to communicate
something that one can appreciate (and I believe that the square that I have
chosen, does just that).
No comments:
Post a Comment