Sunday, August 30, 2009
Art vs. Design
Last class we discussed many interesting aspects to consider when defining both art and design and as well art vs. design. It can be a very tricky topic; however, I believe that one must create his or her own definition. I definitely think design is a form of art. But as Eames stated, "The design is an expression of the purpose. It may (if it is good enough) later be judged as art," I also think that design is art when it reaches a certain level. When a design, painting, drawing, sculpture, or some form of creative and unique piece is developed, it must be able to endure many years into its future and also be recognized by many individuals. Whether the onlookers loved it, hated it, adored it, cried over it, or felt some emotional connection with it, the piece is attracting attention and serving its purpose. For example, Andy Warhol's paintings have survived many years as popular and well known while also attracting new enthusiasts everyday. People will constantly gain and loose interest in things such as the iPhone, what we discussed in class, but the things that remain are considered art. Design can definitely achieve all these points discussed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment